Its Structural Perfection Is Matched Only By Its Hostility.

For the past couple of days, the internet has been in a twitter over the news that a man in Denver planned to release a video documenting an actual alien. The man, Stan Tiger Romanek, had suspected that a peeping Tom was looking in on his young daughters, so he set up a camera to catch him. But instead of catching a peeping Tom, Romanek supposedly captured an “alien.”

Romanek did not appear at the news conference today, but Alejandro Rojas, education director of MUFON, the Mutual UFO Network, introduced the video and tried his level-best to convince the audience that Romanek did not stage the video. Rojas claims that “[Romanek and his daughters] don’t…have the ability or the motivation to fabricate a hoax.” In James Randi’s book Flim Flam, Randi lists 20 “hallmarks of paranormal chicanery” (37). Number 2 on Randi’s list:

“The subject (a child, peasant, or sweet little old lady) is said to be incapable of the techniques required; lack of sophistication precludes deception” (37).

Number 12:

“A subject’s ability to perform trickery is de-emphasized or ignored (39).

And finally, number 14:

“It is said that the subject cannot produce phenomena on command or on a regular basis, since such abilities are ephemeral and sporadic.”

Now, Mr. Romanek claims that he has been visited more than 100 times by aliens, but whatta ya wanna bet that he’ll never be visited when someone else is present? I also find it a little presumptuous that the so-called “experts” on alien visitation seem to think that Mr. Romanek is incapable of faking the video. First off, they didn’t actually release any of the footage of this video to the public, and only a select few journalists were invited to the press conference. Second, take a look at a screen capture from the video:

alien

Scary, ain’t it?

I’m not a special effect genius, but that doesn’t exactly look like a difficult effect to produce. I’ve seen much more convincing, and scary, footage on YouTube that was also produced by “amateurs.” I’m always suspicious about any revelatory film that is in black and white or that is using the low-light infrared feature of consumerbullshit meter video cameras. Trust me on this one; it’s shockingly easy to cover things up using black and white or infrared.

My Bullshit meter almost busted when I read this: “
A documentary is in production that will include much more of the videotape and other evidence, [Rojas] says. It is due to be released later this year.” A documentary, huh? Kinda like “The Blair Witch Project” was a documentary? Or “Cloverfield”?

I’m not gonna lie–I take a great deal of joy in watching this kind of shit. But let’s think about something: The odds of life-forms from another planet having evolved into bipedal mammals that basically look like humans without hair, are infinitesimally small. The odds are so small in fact, that it’s almost idiotic to think that aliens, if there are any, will look anything like us. Also, if these creatures presumably possess the technology to travel through space-time, then why don’t they have some awesome type of imaging system that would allow them to look into Mr. Romanek’s house from the comfort of their Foo Fighter? Why do the advanced race of inerstellar beings have to resort to the shenanigans of George McFly?

I know, I know. I’m throwing a monkey wrench in all the fun with my irritatingly logical and reasonable questions. I’ll stop now.

Categories: Blogging | Leave a comment

links for 2008-05-31

Categories: Daily Link Dump | Leave a comment

links for 2008-05-30

Categories: Daily Link Dump | Leave a comment

Dogs and Cats, Living Together…MASS HYSTERIA!!!

Rupert Murdoch says that McCain is unelectable, and he damn-near endorses Obama.

Scott McLellan, the former White House propaganda-spouting-puppet; press secretary, writes a tell-all book, detailing the incompetence and the duplicity of his former boss.

“Journalists” are coming forward left and right, admitting that they were basically strong-armed into lobbing the administration softballs in the run-up to, and the aftermath of, the Iraq war.

Sydney Pollack and Harvey Korman both die, and yet Eddie Murphy is yet again allowed to make another “Beverly Hills Cop” movie–with Brett Ratner directing, no less.

It feels like we’re living a Groundhog Day version of Opposite Day. If Hillary Clinton goes and announces that she’s pulling out of the race without an extended court battle or a duel at dawn then I’ll be totally convinced that ‘ole Punxsutawney Phil saw his shadow.

Categories: Blogging | 1 Comment

I Weep For Humanity

Fail

Image compliments of Fail Blog.

Categories: Jackassery | 2 Comments

I Hope This Post Finds You Well

I have something I’d like to admit: I was a very poor student.

Not in college, mind you, but as a high school student, I was atrocious. I was disruptive in classes, I rarely turned in homework on time, and even worse, I encouraged my classmates to act up as well. My role as the ring-leader of disruptions was probably more insidious than my actual behavior because I tended to encourage otherwise attentive students into becoming raving anarchists.

In fact, I’ve pretty much stopped telling stories about my high school experience because when I try to relate one of my tales I get the distinctstone impression that people think I’m lying. My friend Tank, whom also attended the same high school, says he’s also stopped telling stories for the same reason.

I swear that everything that follows is completely true.

One time I got a math teacher fired because I convinced him it would be a good idea to let us watch “Basic Instinct” during class time. We actually spanned the viewing into two days because we couldn’t see the whole movie during one fifty minute class, but unfortunately for us, by the second day the word had spread so insidiously that we had students from other classes trying to sneak into our room to watch the movie. The principal walked into the room to investigate all the commotion just as Sharon Stone was dry-humping the leg of her lesbian friend on the dance floor. Rumor had it that I was the student who brought the tape to school, but since no one could prove it, I avoided any kind of punishment.

During my senior year the school had trouble deciding what to do with the male high school students that didn’t want to play football. There was around ten of us, and no one wanted the job of supervising us for last period, which was when the other guys held practice. The year before, the AG teacher had been in charge of keeping an eye on us “roaches,” as we were so lovingly dubbed by the faculty, but he refused to have anything to do with us the next year. So instead of actually hiring a teacher, the principal simply allowed us to hang out in the woods at the far end of the football field. He never came right out and said it, but we pretty much understood that as long as we didn’t cause any trouble so severe that he had to deal with us we could do pretty much whatever the hell we wanted.

So we would relax in the shade, drink sodas, smoke cigarettes, and yell insults at the football players. We thought they were pretty dumb for willingly running around in the 110 degree Texas sun in football gear. Occasionally the football players would run laps around the field, and when they got too close to our woods we would try to see if we could hit them in the helmet with rocks.

During pep rallies, the students would sit in groups according to their grade-level. Well, all of the students except for us Roaches. We sat in a section by ourselves. At the end of each pep rally, the cheerleaders would go to each section in turn and ask them if they had “spirit,” whatever the hell that meant. Accordingly, each section would reply in unison “We’ve got spirit, yes we do! We’ve got spirit, how ’bout you?”. Then the cheerleaders would go to a different section and repeat the whole thing. The whole point was to see which section had the most “spirit,” and which ever section yelled the loudest would win the “Spirit Stick” for that week. The Spirit Stick was supposed to be an honor to win, but I had a hard time conjuring up any reverence for a plastic cougar hot-glued to the top of a piece of PVC pipe. I did, however, find it pretty funny that everyone else went ape-shit for the stupid thing.

Instead of the typical “We’ve got spirit” nonsense, us Roaches would yell, “R-O-C-H-E-S, We’re the Roaches and we’re the BEST!” And yes, I know we misspelled “Roaches.” And week after week we never won the damn Spirit Stick, despite the fact that we were consistently the loudest, and thus, according to the cheerleaders’ own metric, proving we had the most spirit.

And then one day the cheerleaders let us win. I grabbed the Spirit Stick triumphantly. I waved it around like a mad-man.

And then I promptly ran out the door, got in my truck, drove home, stealing the Spirit Stick.

I didn’t think anyone had seen me hijack the Spirit Stick, and even if they did, I planned on simply denying I stole it. The cheerleaders asked me to bring it back. I told them I didn’t have it. They said they only had the one stick, they had spent hours making it, and they had to have it back. I told them I didn’t have it. At the next pep rally, we did not find out who had the most “spirit” because we had no Spirit Stick. Two pep rallies passed, and I thought they had forgotten about the whole thing and I would get to keep the Spirit Stick.

Then one day, the cheerleader sponsor asked to see me. She told me they wanted their stick back. I told her I didn’t have it. Then she showed me these pictures:

stick2stick


In my post-Spirit Stick exuberance I had apparently failed to recall that I had posed for photographs with the Spirit Stick. I brought the Spirit Stick back the next day. The Roaches never won another Spirit competition.

During my Sophomore year, several of us Roaches opted to act as cheerleaders during the Powder Puff football game. By the end of the game we had broken one guy’s arm by throwing him up in the air for a somersault that we had not, in fact, practiced, and we acted so vulgar in our cheerleading uniforms that we were told we could never, EVER participate in Powder Puff football again. Here I am in my outfit:

MWAAAA!


Aren’t I ravishing?

See. I bet you think I’m making all this up, don’t you? Well, I’m not. That’s partially why I included the yearbook photos for this post, despite the inherent embarrassment I feel towards them. Where did all this debauchery take place, you ask? In the little farming community of Aquilla, Texas, pop. 138. We had 168 students, k-12 while I was attending. In my graduating class there were eleven people. I was…well, something of an anomaly in the school and the community as a whole.

And no matter how many years pass, I sometimes still wish I had that Spirit Stick.

Categories: Texaspecific | 4 Comments

Don’t Tease Me–Appease Me!

On Thursday, President Bush made some comments about our foreign policy in a foreign nation. You’d think a folksy kinda guy like Bush would know that family don’t talk about family outside’a family. Anyway, the media is all in a tither because of something the president said. Here’s an excerpt: morans

Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is ”” the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.

I have five to say about this, and I’ll simply take them one by one.

1. Did the President just break Godwin’s Law? I think he did…on international television, no less. Breaking Godwin’s Law, or argumentum ad Hitlerum, was originally developed for internet-arguments, and it states, “As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.” It basically means that the person who brings up Hitler has lost the argument because they can’t think of anything intelligent to say, so they simply call or compare the other person to Hitler or Nazis. It’s like the ad hominem fallacy, only dumber.

2. The senator that Bush is referring to is William Edgar Borah, and he did famously lament, “Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.” But lament is all he did. And he did so after Hitler had invaded Poland.

moran23. Bush needs a fucking dictionary.

Okay, for all my readers out there that have yet to take a sixth grade vocabulary test, let me define some words for you. Negotiation: “mutual discussion and arrangement of the terms of a transaction or agreement: the negotiation of a treaty.” Dialogue: “an exchange of ideas or opinions on a particular issue, esp. a political or religious issue, with a view to reaching an amicable agreement or settlement.” And here’s the last word–Appeasement: calming, reconciling, acquiring peace by way of concessions or gifts (the verb ‘to pay’ also goes back to the Latin ‘pax’ = peace).

Some people have claimed that Bush, in using the term “appeasement,” is referencing Neville Chamberlain with his remarks in Israel. Chamberlain famously, and tragically, allowed Hitler to annex Austria and potions of Munich, in hopes that doing so would appease the dictator. Chamberlain didn’t just talk to the Fuhrer–he gave him a country and a half! Not exactly the same thing as talking. Also, I seriously doubt Bush knows who Chamberlain is. His speech writer might, but I have my doubts about Bush.

4. First the Bush administration claimed that the president was referencing Obama and his foreign policy. Now they’re saying that no, the president was only making a generalized statement about the importance of remaining tough towards terrorists. Please. Enough with that shit. If you’re going to attack someone then man up and go ahead and attack them. Don’t have your namby-pamby press secretary go in and try and smooth over your idiotic and half-assed attempts at nuanced bitch-slapping.

5. The president, John McCain, and pretty much the whole GOP have made a big deal over the fact that a spokesman for Hamas, Ahmed Yousef, has declared that Obama is the militant organization’s pick for President of the United States. Consequently, the Republicans are making the argument that terrorists now support and endorse Barack Obama. If you happen to be in public, and you actually hear someone make this argument, I want you to go up to them and spit right in their mouth. If you get a chance, try to urinate on their foot, too.

Look, I’m sure the Klu Klux Klan would rather John McCain be president than Obama. Does that mean that John McCain would be the KKK president? No. It just means that crazy people can pick candidates, too.

Judging by the speed with which the Obama campaign responded to Bush’s comments, I have a feeling that Obama and his staffers are gearing up to combat the GOP’s sophistic rhetoric head on. I do hope Bush continues to stump for John McCain. There’s no surer way for the GOP to lose in November.

Categories: Politics | Leave a comment

Paradoxes in Thinking?

thinkTowards the middle of the semester in my “Writing Arguments” class, I introduce students to fallacies and flaws that unintentionally, and many times intentionally, creep into arguments. These are fallacies with which most of us are familiar, if not by their name then by their usage, and ones that the media uses frequently and judiciously. Informal fallacies are common, rhetorical tools of politicians and pundits, but they are the fundamental and foundational basis of argument for conspiracy theorists. Read through that wiki list of fallacies and then think about arguments proposed from the likes of Holocaust deniers, 9/11 Truthers, Creationists, NWO believers, etc.

Fallacies are akin to what James Frazer termed “magical thinking.” Magical thinking allows an ignorant mind to make sense of the world in non-scientific terms. Arthur C. Clarke famously stated that “any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Indeed, we encourage this type of thinking in children whether we mean to or not. Every time a child asks “What was that noise in the sky,” and we reply “God bowling” instead of explaining thunder–every time we tell a child “Don’t say that because it might come true,”–every time we encourage a child to believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, or the Tooth Fairy, we encourage them towards magical thinking as a valid, problem-solving mindset.

Fallacious logic and magical thinking bring out the worst in humanity. Willful ignorance only spawns more willful ignorance, and once the feedback loop begins it’s difficult to end.

Now, I do my best to steer students away from this type of thinking in my classes, but I’m only one person, and I can only do so much. Also, I’m only human, and therefore I’m not immune to fallacies and magical thinking.

But while I do my best to eschew this type of thinking in myself and my students, I have to admit, I’m a little hesitant to do so. I’m terrified that by pushing away fallacies and magical thinking that I’ll also be pushing away imaginative sympathies and my ability to daydream. Some of the most beautiful pieces of art and literature the world has ever known were born out of magical thinking, and I’m not no so sure that silencing that aspect of my brain, or my students’ brains, is necessarily a good thing. Can evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology explain the existence of systems of morals and values as adaptive and selective mechanisms? Absolutely. Sadly, those explanations are scientifically dense and dry, and they are no where near as magical, nor nearly as beautiful, as the story of the Garden of Eden.

Fortunately, people like Isaac Asimov, Mark Twain, Terry Pratchett, Kurt Vonnegut, and George Orwell have shown us that magical thinking doesn’t have to squash rationalism and logic.

The inherent problem is that apparently you actually have to be someone like Isaac Asimov, Mark Twain, Terry Pratchett, Kurt Vonnegut, or George Orwell to keep those two disparate mindsets in check. No small task, that.



Categories: Teaching, Writing | 1 Comment

The Angel Opens Her Eyes

Categories: Blogging | 1 Comment

links for 2008-05-06

Categories: Daily Link Dump | 1 Comment

Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: Adventure Journal by Contexture International.